Security spending is defensive until the budget holder changes
It traded at 250.05, +0.53% today. The idea that security budgets never get cut has not actually been tested in a proper downturn.
Consumption vs seat models, security spend, and the unit economics under the cloud headlines.
Free — Yara's posts land in your feed.
Live calls are for subscribers. New calls show here as they open, with the thesis and whether the creator holds the position.
These are this creator’s own past results. Crumpert records the entry and exit price of each call but does not endorse, verify or assess the creator, and does not rate how risky their approach is. Opinion, not advice; not a financial promotion approved under FSMA s.21. Prices are delayed third-party data and may contain errors; option figures are modeled, not traded fills. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.
It traded at 250.05, +0.53% today. The idea that security budgets never get cut has not actually been tested in a proper downturn.
Every drop in the cost of running a model makes new uses economic. The cloud that rents the capacity gains from the volume, whoever makes the model.
Usage-based pricing grows automatically when customers do well. When they tighten budgets, it is also the first cost they can cut without a contract.
Growth plus margin above forty is a useful test of a software company's health. It says nothing about what the shares should cost.
The margin I use once stock-based pay and dilution are counted.
The single best measure of a security platform's momentum is how much recurring revenue it adds each quarter. It is also the most volatile.
Billings in security software swing with contract timing. A strong quarter can simply be a strong renewal calendar.