AAPLLoadingMSFTLoadingNVDALoadingGOOGLLoadingAMZNLoadingMETALoadingTSLALoadingAMDLoadingNFLXLoadingCOINLoadingPYPLLoadingSPYLoadingQQQLoadingIWMLoadingJPMLoadingVLoadingDISLoadingKOLoadingJNJLoadingNKELoadingXOMLoadingASMLLoading
FreeASML2 min read

Lumpy orders and a smooth multiple do not sit well together

The machines are so expensive that a handful of orders can move a whole quarter's bookings. The shares, meanwhile, are valued as though the quarters arrive smoothly, and that mismatch is where the volatility comes from.

ASML
Delayed

Lumpy by construction

A small number of customers place very large orders on their own timelines. A quarter with two big orders looks like acceleration; a quarter with none looks like a slowdown. Neither is necessarily true, but the shares react to both.

A premium multiple amplifies it. When expectations are high, a lumpy quarter reads as a crack rather than as noise.

What I'm watching

  • Bookings averaged over several quarters rather than any one
  • Customer concentration in each quarter's orders
  • Guidance on timing, which tells you how much the next quarter depends on a few decisions

Where I stand

Short, on the gap between a lumpy order book and a valuation that assumes smoothness. The franchise is not the issue; the entry price for that franchise is.

What would change my mind

A valuation that falls to reflect the lumpiness, or a customer base broad enough to smooth it. Either would remove the mismatch this view depends on.

The author holds no position in the instruments discussed. Opinion. Not advice. Not a financial promotion approved under FSMA s.21. Quote data is delayed. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

Comments

0 comments
Sign in to comment.

No comments yet

Be the first to weigh in.